Method and system for correlating conversations in a messaging environment

ABSTRACT

A computer based method for correlating conversations is provided, including the steps of providing a discussion interface at an interface device, receiving an indication that one of several messages displayed at the discussion interface is part of an active conversation, providing a message entry location for imputing new messages associated with the discussion interface, and receiving new messages at the message entry location. New messages received are automatically associated with the active conversation by displaying them with a visual cue shared by all messages associated with the active conversation.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplications, No. 61/920,177, filed Dec. 23, 2013, No. 62/000,220, filedMay 19, 2014, and No. 62/061,308, filed Oct. 8, 2014, the contents ofeach of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for correlatingconversations in a messaging environment, such as in a chat applicationfor a mobile phone.

BACKGROUND

Various forms of electronic communications have become ubiquitous inrecent years, with internet technologies allowing for new and rapidforms of communications. These forms of communications, such as instantmessaging, often rely on a “chat” interface, for transmitting shortmessages, referred to as “chats,” rapidly between users. These chatsoften form an extended dialogue between multiple parties, stretchingacross multiple conversation topics and extended periods of time.Accordingly, while a participant in such a dialogue may continue tosubmit chats responsive to earlier received chats, it is often unclearwhat earlier question or prompt the participant is answering orresponding to.

Accordingly, a first chat participant may send two questions, and asecond chat participant may respond to the second question prior toresponding to the first question. This may occur for a variety ofreasons. For example, the second chat participant may not wish torespond to all questions, or the questions may have been delivered tohim out of order. Alternatively, the response order may have simply madesense to the second user at the time, or the response order may differfor any number of other reasons.

Extended chat sessions therefore often comprise different types ofmessages, such as questions, prompts, offhand comments, and answers, andtypically involve multiple conversations continuing in parallel, withmessages, or chats, presented to users in chronological order. Thissimple chronological ordering can lead to confusion, since it may not beclear what the participant is responding to in any particular chat,particularly where the participants switch between topics rapidly.

For a variety of reasons, in various other communication formats, it isnot always clear what earlier comment a particular comment is responsiveto. For example, an email may include questions on multiple topics,while a response may respond to those questions out of order. The sameissues occur in online commenting systems, and the issues are enhancedwhen more than two participants are involved in a chat.

There is a need for a messaging method that allows parties conversing tofollow multiple conversations exactly, even where those multipleconversations are intertwined and include questions, prompts, andanswers that cross each other chronologically.

SUMMARY

A computer based method for correlating conversations in a messagingenvironment is provided, wherein a user is provided with a discussioninterface at a first interface device, and messages are displayed at thediscussion interface. The messages displayed can include a first andsecond message. An indication, such as a tapping input, is thenreceived, at the interface device, that a previously displayed messageis part of an active conversation. The active conversation may be, forexample, one of several previously existing conversations.Alternatively, the message selected may have no previous conversationalassociations, and may therefore be defined as a new conversation, whichis then defined as “active.”

The method then provides a message entry location for inputting newmessages, the message entry location associated with the discussioninterface. New messages received at the message entry location areassociated with the conversation defined as active, and when displayed,the new message is then displayed incorporating a visual cue shared byall messages of the active conversation. The visual cue may be, forexample, the color coding of messages.

The conversational affiliations may be applied after messages areentered as well, such that messages in the discussion interface arefirst displayed without incorporating a visual cue, and are latermodified to incorporate a visual cue.

The method may then receive an indication that a different message or asecond conversation is to be defined as the active conversation,cancelling or replacing the earlier definition of the activeconversation, and new messages then received at the message entrylocation are defined as part of the then current active conversation.Accordingly, the display of such new messages incorporates a secondvisual cue shared by messages associated with the second conversation,the second visual cue different than the first visual cue. For example,each of the first visual cue and the second visual cue may be adifferent background color for the messages.

The visual cues may be applied while the messages remain listed in thechronological order in which they were received, or they may bereorganized to reflect groupings of conversation. In some embodiments,visual elements are applied to the discussion interface or the messageentry location to highlight the identity of the active conversation. Insuch embodiments, the visual cue may be reflected in the visualelements, or the visual elements may be a tint in the same color as thevisual cue.

The visual cue may be a proximity from message to message, such that anew message is displayed at a location within the discussion interfacein closer proximity to the first message relative to the proximity ofthe second message to the first message.

Typically, the platform described may allow the method to be appliedacross multiple interface devices. In such embodiments, changes made atthe first interface device, such as identification of activeconversations and the affiliation of comments with differentconversations, are reflected at a second interface device using visualcues. This may be coordinated by a server having a conversation index,and each user may have different visual cues defined in user settings.

For implementing the methods described, a system for correlatingconversations is provided, the system comprising an interface device incommunication with a computerized network. The interface device thencomprises a processor for implementing a software application, memoryfor storing the software application and for storing a plurality ofmessages in accordance with the software application, a transmissionunit for transmitting messages to the computerized network, and adisplay. The software application comprises instructions for providing adiscussion interface at the display of the user interface device fordisplaying messages stored in the memory, recording an indication thatone of several conversations, each comprising one or more of themessages stored in memory, is an active conversation, and providing amessage entry location for entering new messages, the message entrylocation associated with the discussion interface, receiving at leastone new message entered at the message entry location, transmitting,using the transmission unit, the at least one new message to thecomputerized network incorporating an indication of which of the severalconversations was the active conversation at the time of entry of thenew messages, and displaying, at the display, the at least one newmessage alongside the several conversations and incorporating visualcues shared with any messages that are part of the conversation that wasthe active conversation upon entry of the at least one new message.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system for implementing the method forcorrelating conversations.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the method for correlating conversations.

FIGS. 3A-G illustrates an exemplary user interface for implementing themethod of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 illustrates an additional aspect of the user interface of FIG.3A-G.

FIGS. 5A-B illustrate an alternative visual cue for use with the userinterface of FIG. 3A-G.

FIG. 6 shows an alternative implementation of the method of FIG. 2incorporating a group chat interface.

FIGS. 7A-F shows the method of FIG. 2 implemented in an email interface.

FIG. 8 shows the method of FIG. 2 implemented in a commenting system.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a method for retroactively editingmessages.

FIGS. 10A-10F show a user interface, such as that of FIGS. 3A-G,implementing the retroactive editing features of FIG. 9.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The description of illustrative embodiments according to principles ofthe present invention is intended to be read in connection with theaccompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entirewritten description. In the description of embodiments of the inventiondisclosed herein, any reference to direction or orientation is merelyintended for convenience of description and is not intended in any wayto limit the scope of the present invention. Relative terms such as“lower,” “upper,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “above,” “below,” “up,”“down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivative thereof (e.g.,“horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed torefer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawingunder discussion. These relative terms are for convenience ofdescription only and do not require that the apparatus be constructed oroperated in a particular orientation unless explicitly indicated assuch. Terms such as “attached,” “affixed,” “connected,” “coupled,”“interconnected,” and similar refer to a relationship wherein structuresare secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectlythrough intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigidattachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise.Moreover, the features and benefits of the invention are illustrated byreference to the exemplified embodiments. Accordingly, the inventionexpressly should not be limited to such exemplary embodimentsillustrating some possible non-limiting combination of features that mayexist alone or in other combinations of features; the scope of theinvention being defined by the claims appended hereto.

This disclosure describes the best mode or modes of practicing theinvention as presently contemplated. This description is not intended tobe understood in a limiting sense, but provides an example of theinvention presented solely for illustrative purposes by reference to theaccompanying drawings to advise one of ordinary skill in the art of theadvantages and construction of the invention. In the various views ofthe drawings, like reference characters designate like or similar parts.

Described below are various methods and systems for correlatingconversations in a messaging environment, such as in situations wheremultiple conversations, or conversation threads, are occurring within asingle chat window or other messaging environment. The method and systemare described with reference to a computer system utilizing userinterface devices, such as those shown in FIG. 1. Typically, the methodis performed on and between a first interface device 100 a, used by afirst user 110 a, and a second interface device 100 b, used by a seconduser 110 b. Each user 110 uses their respective user interface device tocreate and transmit messages as part of various conversations. A firstuser may then select a conversation from a discussion interface andcreate a message to transmit to the second user 110 b as part of theconversation selected. To effectuate such a message transmission, asdescribed in more detail below, each interface device 100 is thenprovided with a discussion interface 120 a, b, a message entry location130 a, b associated with the discussion interface, and several settings140 a, b associated with the discussion interface and the message entrylocation. The interface devices may be, for example, portable computingdevices, such as smart phones, tablets, laptops, or other types ofcomputer terminals. The interface devices typically interface with acomputerized network, such as a server 150 as described below, and theymay contain any hardware necessary to do so, such as transmitter andreceiver components.

The interface devices 100 a, b typically connect to each other through aserver 150. The server then maintains a receiver 160 and a transmitter170, and a conversation index 180. When the first user 110 a, forexample, selects a conversation to and transmits a message to the seconduser 110 b, the first interface device 100 a transmits the message tothe server 150, which receives the message at the receiver 160,determines if the message is part of a conversation in the conversationindex 180 and sends it, via the transmitter 170 to the second interfacedevice 110 b. In the discussion below, to be considered alongside theflowcharts and the figures, when the first interface device 110 atransmits a message to a second interface device 110 b, or vice versa,such transmission may be by way of server 150. In such a scenario, itwill be understood that the server will utilize the receiver 160,transmitter 170, and conversation index 180 as necessary.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an implementation of the method ofcorrelating conversations and FIGS. 3A-G show an exemplary userinterface implementing the method of correlating conversations.

Initially, the first user 110 a is provided with a messaging application(200) having a user interface 400. The user interface may provide a listof contacts 410 with whom the user has active chat sessions. The userinterface 400 may then provide an option to create a new chat session420, or a user 110 may instead choose to continue a previously activechat session with one of the contacts listed 410, as shown in FIG. 3A.

Upon selecting an active chat session 410, as in FIG. 3B, the user isprovided (210) with a discussion interface 430. The discussion interface430 has a message entry location 440 associated therewith, and mayfurther incorporate a virtual keyboard 450 or other data input tools.The name of a party 460, such as the second user 110 b with whom thefirst user 110 a is chatting, may be identified within, or inassociation with, the discussion interface 430.

Upon providing the discussion interface 430 at (210) for an active chatsession, several messages 470 a, b may be displayed therein. This methodconnects messages in terms of “conversations,” and thereby ultimatelyassigns messages to such conversations. Accordingly, messages interactedwith may be previously assigned to such conversations, and in such ascenario the first message 470 a may be part of a first conversation,and the second message 470 b may be part of a second conversation.Alternatively, the messages 470 may be initially unassigned toconversations. In the embodiment shown, the messages 470 may thereforebe provided with default visual cues designating the messages asunassigned to conversations, in contrast with visual cues correlatingconversations as discussed below.

The first user 110 a may wish to continue a conversation from, orprovide a message responsive to, one of the several messages 470.Accordingly the first user 110 a may indicate, or call out to thesystem, which one of the messages 470 he would like to respond to by,for example, tapping a touch screen of the first interface device 100 aat a location of the first message 470 a. Other selection methods, suchas highlighting, are contemplated as well. This indication defines thatmessage, or a conversation that the message is a part of, as an activeconversation (220), and indicates that a following new message will bepart of that active conversation. The first message 470 a is used merelyas an example, and any message shown may be tapped to define an activeconversation.

Accordingly, if the first message 470 a was previously part of a firstconversation, the first conversation is defined as the activeconversation. If the message was not previously defined, it would thenbe assigned to a first conversation and the first conversation would bedefined as active.

As shown in FIG. 3C, future messages transmitted from the firstinterface device 100 a will then be automatically assigned to the activeconversation, so long as the active conversation is defined. When theuser 110 a creates a new message (230) at the message entry location440, the message 470 c is therefore incorporated into the conversationthat has been defined as active. When the new message is then displayed(240), it is displayed with a visual cue shared with other messagesassociated with the active conversation, in this case the first message470 a. Typically, the visual cue may be a color associated with theactive conversation, but it may instead be by way of text size, symbolsor icons appended to the message, indentation levels, font formattingsuch as italics, bold, or underline, bullet styles, or characterspreceding the message. As shown in the figures, the active conversationmay be provided with a crosshatching matching other messages 470 a ofthe active conversation.

The first user 110 a may then, using the interface device 100 a,transmit the new message to the second user 110 b. Accordingly, whilethe new message is displayed (at 240) at the first user's 110 ainterface device 100 a it may be simultaneously transmitted (250), alongwith an indication that it is part of the conversation that has beenmarked as active, to the server 150 where it is logged at theconversation index 180, and transmitted by the transmitter 170 to thesecond user 110 b. The message may then be displayed (255) as part ofthe then active conversation when displayed on the second user interfacedevice 100 b.

Typically, the second user 110 b will receive the conversationalaffiliations defined by the first user, but will not have theconversation selected by the first user defined as an activeconversation on his interface device 100 b. Accordingly, when the firstuser 110 a taps a message, defining a conversation, the color may changeon the second user's device, but new messages entered at the secondinterface device 100 b will not be automatically associated with thatconversation.

In this way, the platform creates linkages between messages that arepart of a conversation. Because the linkages defined in this method maybe implemented and recorded independently of the particular visual cue,and because each message is typically transmitted from a first user 110a to a second user 110 b using server 150, the conversation records maybe maintained at the server 150 in the conversation index 180, and thelinkages may be represented in accordance with settings 140 at eachindividual interface device.

As shown in FIG. 3D, throughout the process, the first user 110 a mayreceive (260) additional messages 470 d from, for example, the seconduser 110 b utilizing a second interface device 100 b. These messages mayarrive already defined as part of a previously existing conversation, orthey may arrive as individual messages with no conversationalaffiliation. If the additional messages 470 d arrive as individualmessages, they will be provided with default formatting and visual cues,but if they are already defined as part of a previously existingconversation, they will be provided with visual cues matching othermessages that are part of that particular conversation. Informationabout whether such incoming messages are part of a previously existingconversation may be received, for example, from server 150 and may bestored in the conversation index 180. Alternatively, such indicationsmay be embedded in the messages themselves using a markup taggingsystem, for example. In this way, the method may be performed without anindependent conversation index, and may be entirely implemented as apeer to peer chat platform.

The first user 110 a may then wish to continue a conversation from, orprovide a message responsive to, another one of the several messages470. For example, the user may wish to define the just received message470 d as part of a second conversation. Accordingly the first user 110 amay indicate that they would like to respond to the just receivedmessage 470 d by, for example, tapping a touch screen of the firstinterface device 100 a at the location of the message 470 d. As before,this selection defines that message as part of a new active conversation(270), now a second conversation, and indicates that a following newmessage will be part of that active conversation. When a new, ordifferent conversation is defined as the active conversation in thismanner, any previous indication of a different message as part of theactive conversation is revoked, such that only one conversation (eitherthe first conversation, comprising the first and third messages 470 a, cor the second conversation, comprising the new message 470 d, forexample) is active at any given time.

As above, when the user 110 a then creates a new message (280) at themessage entry location 440, the message 470 e is incorporated into theconversation that has been defined as active. When the new message isthen displayed (290), it is displayed with a visual cue shared withother messages associated with the active conversation. Accordingly, asshown in FIG. 3E, the two messages of the second conversation 470 d′, e,defined as active, are provided with matching crosshatching.

The method can continue in this manner, such that the first user 110 amay select an earlier received or displayed message 470 b, defining itas a part of an active conversation (now a third conversation) andcreate a new message 470 f to match a visual cue consistent across thethird conversation. Similarly, messages initially transmitted, created,or received by a user without an active conversation defined 470 g mayappear with default visual cues. A user may choose not to define anactive conversation, or may cancel out a previous selection of an activeconversation, thereby continuing to transmit or receive messages 470 hwith default formatting. Such messages may later be retroactivelyapplied to conversations resulting in visual cues being applied afterthe fact, as in 470 g′, h′ as shown in FIG. 3F-G

FIG. 4 shows a discussion interface displaying a conversationsubstantively identical to that discussed with respect to FIGS. 2-3, butwithout any conversational affiliations applied. In such a scenario, allmessages 570 a-h are shown with default formatting. The first user 110 amay then retroactively assign all messages to conversations. This may bedone by, for example selecting multiple messages simultaneously, therebylinking them together, or by selecting conversations from a dropdownmenu associated with each message, thereby assigning the messages toselected conversations. Accordingly, a user may first select the firstand third messages in a list 570 a, c, and assign them to a firstconversation comprising those messages 570 a′, c′, a fourth and fifthmessage in the list 570 d, e, and assign them to a second conversation,and a second and sixth message in the list 570 b, f, and assign them toa third conversation.

As shown, messages may therefore be created or received withconversational affiliations already incorporated, or they may be createdwithout an active conversation defined or received without such anaffiliation, and may therefore be created or received with defaultvisual cues applied. Conversational affiliations may then be appliedusing a prompt, menu, or other scheme implemented in the interface.

While the methods have been described with respect to a first user 110a, all messages generated at one of the interface devices 100 aretypically transmitted to the other. Accordingly, linkages defined byeach user appear at the discussion interfaces 120 of both users, witheach user's display formatted according to their own settings 140.Therefore, conversational affiliations defined across both userinterfaces may be defined by visual cues independently defined based onuser settings 140.

FIGS. 5A-B show the use of the alignment of messages in a list ofmessages as a part of a visual cue correlating conversations. Messages600 a-d are displayed in a discussion interface 610 in the order inwhich they are initially received. They may be received with indicationsassigning them to first and second conversations, or they may bereceived without such indications and may be assigned to suchconversations after the fact. Once assigned, the messages are thenrealigned to show them in first and second blocks 620 a, b representingthe first and second conversations. Accordingly, the first message 600a′ may be shown in a first block 620 a with the third message 600 c andthe second message 600 b′ may be shown in a second block 620 b with thefourth message 600 d′. The realignment may occur upon receipt ofconversation assignments for the messages 600 a-d, or it may insteadoccur after receiving a command to align from a user. Accordingly, auser may first see a new message just received at the bottom of a list,and may input a command to have the messages realigned. In some suchscenario, the messages may return to their originally received orderafter such command expires, such as after a period of time, so that thechronological integrity of the chat window is maintained.

In each of the scenarios discussed, the first user 110 a may assignmessages to conversations, and the method may then apply visual cuesillustrating the specific conversation to which each message has beenassigned. In some embodiments, either the first user 110 a or the seconduser 110 b may reassign messages previously assigned. In such ascenario, the new assignment may be transmitted to the server 150 whichmay in turn record the new assignment at the conversation index 180 andtransmit the new assignment to the other user 110 such that the newassignment can be reflected in each respective discussion interface 430.

Accordingly, if a second user 110 b disagrees with the first user's 110a assignment of a message to a conversation, or wishes to select asingle previously assigned message to begin a new conversation, he mayselect that message using an appropriate selection method. For example,a user may double tap a message to bring up a contextual menu, or toperform a specific action. Such selection methods may be defined in usersettings 140 specific to each interface device 100.

Where additional messages are added to the discussion interface, theinterface may scroll to accommodate new messages. Accordingly, earliermessages may be forced off of a screen of the interface device 100, anda large number of independent conversations may be definedsimultaneously. When visual cues of the users 110 preferred type areexhausted, the cues may recycle. Accordingly, when the platform runs outof colors with which to color code, the platform may select anappropriate color to reuse by monitoring, for example, a visual cueassociated with the conversation that has not been used in the longestperiod of time. Messages that are forced off screen, but that stillexist within the discussion interface 430 may be accessed by scrollingupwards, and when viewed, may retain their visual cues identifying theconversation they are associated with.

In some embodiments, where a user has selected an active conversationbut has not entered a message in an extended period of time, theplatform removes the active conversation designation, returning the userto a default mode.

While the method for correlating conversations in a messagingenvironment is discussed with respect to a two user “chat” application,it may be applied in a wide variety of additional types of messagingenvironments, such as within an email, in a group chat interface, or ina commenting system on a website. Each of these scenarios will bedescribed, and additional features more easily illustrated with respectto those environments will be described therewith.

FIG. 6 shows the method for correlating conversations applied to a groupchat interface 700. Such an interface may be nearly identical to thethat discussed above with respect to discussion interface 430, but mayallow users to receive messages from both a second user 110 b at asecond interface device 100 a, and a third user at a third interfacedevice (not shown). In such a scenario, users 110 may indicate that amessage is part of a specified conversation, and visual cues may then beapplied in the same way as discussed above. Accordingly, the group chatenvironment may show several messages 710 a-e with a first message 710 acorrelated with a first conversation, a second, third, and fourthmessage 710 b-d shown as part of a second conversation, and a fifthmessage 710 e shown as part of a third conversation. Messages from otherusers are individually marked by, for example, indicating their name inassociation with the comment.

FIGS. 7A-F shows the method for correlating conversations applied to anemail interface. As shown the first user 110 a may receive an email in areceived email window 800 showing received or transmitted messages atthe first user interface 100 a which has multiple topics, eachcomprising different subject matter, and the user may wish to respond toeach of those topics independently. While the email may initially beshown as a single block of text, or as a series of paragraphs withoutany distinctive formatting, multiple clauses 810 a-d, each of which maybe responded to independently.

As in the discussion interface 430 discussed above, the emailapplication may be provided with a message entry location 820 forinputting an email responsive to a message or messages shown in thereceived email interface.

Accordingly, a user 110 may select a first clause 810 a to define aspart of a first conversation, and may then input, at the message entrylocation 820, a message responsive to that first clause 830 a, as shownin FIG. 7B. The user 110 may then select a different clause, such as thethird clause 810 c, and draft a response 830 c responsive to thatclause, as shown in FIG. 7C.

The user 110 may continue in this manner, selecting a different clause,such as the fourth clause 810 d, and drafting responses 830 d.

As shown, the user 110 may determine how to break up individualparagraphs, or even sentences, to define the clauses 810 a-d to respondto. Such a feature is more easily illustrated with respect to an emailinterface than with respect to a chat interface, since emails oftenincorporate longer paragraphs that may contain multiple clauses thatrequire independent responses. Here, the user 110 would like to respondto a question posed in the third clause 810 c separately from anexclamation in the fourth clause 810 d.

Finally, clauses may be responded to in any order, such that the user110, after preparing responses to the first, third, and fourth clauses810 a, c, d, may then respond to the second clause 810 b, by enteringresponse 830 b as shown in FIG. 7E.

In preparing an email responsive to an email received, a user 110 mayalso include clauses in their response that are not responsive to anypreviously received message. Accordingly, a fifth response clause may beadded to the message with default formatting that is not part of anydefined conversation, as shown in FIG. 7F. A user may cancel apreviously defined active conversation by selecting a new conversationto be active or by selecting a blank space in the received email window800.

As discussed in more detail above, the responses to each clause 830 a-dis paired to the corresponding clause by way of a visual cue. This maybe a matching color tying conversations together or a matchingcrosshatching pattern, or any of the other interface device settings 140as discussed above.

Typically, an email platform may have a default method of breaking uptext into blocks to be treated as the clauses described above. In suchscenarios, the platform may recognize each paragraph independently bydefault. However, a user may want to respond to two separate portions ofa single paragraph independently, and may therefore override the defaultbreakup of the text. Accordingly, a user 110 may select a default blockof text 610 a by using a first selection method, such as tapping at atouch screen of an interface device 100, and may select a portion of adefault block of text 610 c, or multiple blocks of text, using analternate selection method, such as by clicking and dragging across thetext to select.

The formatting to be used on a given interface device 100 may be definedat that device in settings 140 defined by the corresponding user 110.Accordingly two users conversing may each have their own visual cueassigned, such as a customized color scheme, or font options.

FIG. 8 shows the method for correlating conversations applied to acommenting system 900, such as on a website or in an online forum. Suchan interface may be nearly identical to the that discussed above withrespect to group chat interface 700, but may be appended to an object910 that the discussions apply to, or may be incorporated into awebsite. Accordingly, multiple comments 920 a-d may be assigned to oneof two conversations, with a first conversation comprising the first andthird comments 920 a, c, and the third conversation comprising thesecond and fourth comments 920 b, d.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a method for applying retroactiveediting features to a discussion interface, such as that described inFIGS. 2-3, and FIGS. 10A-F show a discussion application incorporatingsuch a retroactive editing feature. In the embodiment shown, a user maytype a message (1000) into a message entry location 1100 and transmitthat message (1010), resulting in the message 1110 appearing in adiscussion interface 1120, as shown in FIG. 10B. The user may laterregret transmitting the message, or may notice a mistake in the messageand may wish to correct it. Accordingly, the user may choose to modifythe previously transmitted message 1110.

To do so, the user may access (1020) a contextual menu 1130, as shown inFIG. 10C, or may perform a specified action, such as triple tapping themessage (1030). Such action may be defined as a “hotkey” by assigning itin user preferences specific to the interface device 100. Afterinputting the command to edit the message 1110, an edit pop up in whichthe message may be edited appears (1040) in the chat application. Theuser 110 may then edit (1050) the message 1110, creating a new message1110′, and accept the changes to the message (1060) by selecting anappropriate button 150 of the edit popup, as shown in FIG. 10E. Afterapproving such edits, the message is updated, deleted, or replaced,within the discussion interface 1120, as shown in FIG. 10F, and suchchange may be transmitted to all interface devices 100 participating inthe chat (1070). This may be done through the server 150, for example.The user may edit the modified message 1110′, creating new messages1110″ replacing the previous iterations of the message.

This feature may be implemented using a wide variety of interfaces, andmay be accessed by, for example, using a long press of a message tobring up a contextual menu, or double or triple tapping a message.

Limitations may be applied to this editing process in the discussioninterface 1120. For example, edits may only be allowed within some timelimit of the initial message transmission (1010) in order to maintainthe integrity of discussions occurring within the interface. Where atime limit is applied to editing features, the use of that editingfeature may reset the time limit. Accordingly, if a user is given oneminute to edit a message and chooses to edit the message during thattime, the user may be given one minute from the time of editing to usethe editing interface again.

In some embodiments, when a first user edits a message, the second usermay be given access to both the edited message and the original,unedited, message. In some embodiments, the second user may be givenaccess to the original message only if a message has been edited after agiven time limit.

In all of the interfaces described, the methods discussed ultimatelyassign messages to individual conversations, such that suchconversations may be more easily tracked by users 110. These interfacesmay then provide additional features to aid the visualization of suchconversations by. Several examples are now described.

Upon displaying a variety of conversations, as shown in FIG. 3G forexample, a user may select one of the conversations, defining thatconversation as active. The application may then highlight thatconversation in a variety of ways relative to other conversations. Forexample, various aspects of the interface, such as the message entrylocation and the discussion interface may have backgrounds that can betinted to correlate with the visual cue of the active conversation.Similarly, a tint may be applied to a virtual keyboard shown. In someembodiments, the message entry location may be modified so that textentered appears in the same format and with the same visual cues as willappear when the text is transmitted, while in others, a tint is appliedso that the currently active conversation is clear.

In some embodiments, the discussion interface may apply a filter so thatall conversations other than the active conversation are removed fromthe display. In others, all conversations other than the activeconversation remain present but are faded such that the activeconversation is most prominent. Alternatively, if one conversation hasended both others are ongoing, a user may apply a filter to remove theconcluded conversation and retain all other active conversations.Accordingly, a single question and answer sequence not relevant to otherconversations may be easily removed.

Messages described in this application are typically illustrated as textbased messages, but may incorporate or comprise image, video, or audiomessages as well. In such scenarios, a visual cue may be applied to themessage in the form of a background color, for example.

Embodiments of the subject matter and the operations described in thisspecification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or incomputer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structuresdisclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or incombinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matterdescribed in this specification can be implemented as one or morecomputer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer programinstructions, encoded on computer storage medium for execution by, or tocontrol the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively or inaddition, the program instructions can be encoded on an artificiallygenerated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical,optical, or electromagnetic signal that is generated to encodeinformation for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus forexecution by a data processing apparatus. A computer storage medium canbe, or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, acomputer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memoryarray or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover,while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computerstorage medium can be a source or destination of computer programinstructions encoded in an artificially generated propagated signal. Thecomputer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or moreseparate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, orother storage devices).

The operations described in this specification can be implemented asoperations performed by a data processing apparatus on data stored onone or more computer-readable storage devices or received from othersources.

The term “data processing apparatus” and like terms encompass all kindsof apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including byway of example a programmable processor, a computer, a system on a chip,or multiple ones, or combinations, of the foregoing. The apparatus caninclude special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (fieldprogrammable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integratedcircuit). The apparatus can also include, in addition to hardware, codethat creates an execution environment for the computer program inquestion, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocolstack, a database management system, an operating system, across-platform runtime environment, a virtual machine, or a combinationof one or more of them. The apparatus and execution environment canrealize various different computing model infrastructures, such as webservices, distributed computing and grid computing infrastructures.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, softwareapplication, script, or code) can be written in any form of programminglanguage, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative orprocedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as astandalone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, orother unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computerprogram may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. Aprogram can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programsor data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup languagedocument), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or inmultiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules,sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployedto be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are locatedat one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by acommunication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can beperformed by one or more programmable processors executing one or morecomputer programs to perform actions by operating on input data andgenerating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performedby, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logiccircuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC(application specific integrated circuit).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, byway of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, andany one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, aprocessor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory ora random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer area processor for performing actions in accordance with instructions andone or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally,a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive datafrom or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices forstoring data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks.However, a computer need not have such devices. Moreover, a computer canbe embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personaldigital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console,a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device(e.g., a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive), to name just a few.Devices suitable for storing computer program instructions and datainclude all forms of non volatile memory, media and memory devices,including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM,EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal harddisks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and CD ROM and DVD-ROMdisks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, orincorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subjectmatter described in this specification can be implemented on a computerhaving a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquidcrystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and akeyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by whichthe user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices canbe used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example,feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g.,visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input fromthe user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, ortactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user bysending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is usedby the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on auser's client device in response to requests received from the webbrowser.

Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can beimplemented in a computing system that includes a back end component,e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g.,an application server, or that includes a front end component, e.g., aclient computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browserthrough which a user can interact with an implementation of the subjectmatter described in this specification, or any combination of one ormore such back end, middleware, or front end components. The componentsof the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digitaldata communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples ofcommunication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a widearea network (“WAN”), an inter-network (e.g., the Internet), andpeer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks).

The computing system can include clients and servers. A client andserver are generally remote from each other and typically interactthrough a communication network. The relationship of client and serverarises by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In someembodiments, a server transmits data (e.g., an HTML page) to a clientdevice (e.g., for purposes of displaying data to and receiving userinput from a user interacting with the client device). Data generated atthe client device (e.g., a result of the user interaction) can bereceived from the client device at the server.

While this specification contains many specific implementation details,these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of anyinventions or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions offeatures specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions.Certain features that are described in this specification in the contextof separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in asingle embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described inthe context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multipleembodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover,although features may be described above as acting in certaincombinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more featuresfrom a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from thecombination, and the claimed combination may be directed to asubcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particularorder, this should not be understood as requiring that such operationsbe performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, orthat all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirableresults. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processingmay be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various systemcomponents in the embodiments described above should not be understoodas requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should beunderstood that the described program components and systems cangenerally be integrated together in a single software product orpackaged into multiple software products.

While the present invention has been described at some length and withsome particularity with respect to the several described embodiments, itis not intended that it should be limited to any such particulars orembodiments or any particular embodiment, but it is to be construed withreferences to the appended claims so as to provide the broadest possibleinterpretation of such claims in view of the prior art and, therefore,to effectively encompass the intended scope of the invention.Furthermore, the foregoing describes the invention in terms ofembodiments foreseen by the inventor for which an enabling descriptionwas available, notwithstanding that insubstantial modifications of theinvention, not presently foreseen, may nonetheless represent equivalentsthereto.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer based method for correlatingconversations in a messaging environment, the method comprising:providing a discussion interface at a first interface device, whereinthe discussion interface displays a first message and a second message;providing a message entry location for inputting new messages, themessage entry location associated with the discussion interface,receiving, at the first interface device, a first indication that thefirst message is part of an active conversation; changing a visualelement of the message entry location upon receipt of the firstindication to match a first visual cue shared by messages associatedwith the active conversation; receiving a first new message at themessage entry location; and displaying the first new message within thediscussion interface at the first interface device, wherein thedisplaying of the first new message incorporates the first visual cueshared by messages associated with the active conversation.
 2. Thecomputer based method of claim 1 wherein the first indication isgenerated by a tapping input at a touch sensitive display of the firstinterface device.
 3. The computer based method of claim 1 wherein thevisual cue is a first color assigned to the first conversation, andwherein the second message is displayed in a second color.
 4. Thecomputer based method of claim 1 further comprising: displaying thefirst new message in the discussion interface without incorporating thefirst visual cue prior to receiving the first indication, and displayingthe first new message in the discussion interface with the first visualcue incorporated after receiving the first indication.
 5. The computerbased method of claim 1, wherein the first message is part of a firstconversation and the second message is part of a second conversation,the method further comprising: defining, upon receiving the firstindication, the first conversation as the active conversation, anddefining the first new message as part of the first conversation,wherein the first visual cue is incorporated into any previouslydisplayed messages that are part of the first conversation.
 6. Thecomputer based method of claim 5 further comprising: receiving, at thefirst interface device, after displaying the first new message, a secondindication that the second message is part of an active conversation;defining, upon receiving the second indication, the active conversationas the second conversation exclusively; receiving a second new messageat the message entry location; and displaying the second new message inthe discussion interface at the first interface device; wherein thedisplaying of the second new message incorporates a second visual cueshared by messages associated with the second conversation.
 7. Thecomputer based method of claim 6 wherein the first and second newmessages are displayed in the discussion interface in the chronologicalorder in which they were received.
 8. The computer based method of claim7 further comprising: changing a visual element of the message entrylocation upon receipt of the first indication to match the first visualcue, and upon receipt of the second indication, changing the visualelement of the message entry location match the second visual cue, suchthat the visual element of the message entry location matches thedefined active conversation.
 9. The computer based method of claim 8wherein the visual element is a background color.
 10. The computer basedmethod of claim 1 further comprising: providing the discussion interfaceat a second interface device, wherein the discussion interface includesthe first message and a second message; receiving, at the secondinterface device, the first indication; displaying the first new messageat the second interface device, wherein the displaying of the first newmessage incorporates a third visual cue shared solely by messagesassociated with the active conversation of the first indication.
 11. Thecomputer based method of claim 10 wherein the first indication isgenerated at the first interface device and is received at the secondinterface device from one of a server or the first interface device. 12.The computer based method of claim 10 wherein the first visual cue andthe third visual cue differ and are based on user preferences at each ofthe first user interface device and the second user interface device.13. The computer based method of claim 1 wherein the visual element is abackground color.
 14. The computer based method of claim 1 wherein thefirst visual cue is in the form of proximity such that the first newmessage is displayed at a location within the discussion interface incloser proximity to the first message relative to proximity of thesecond message to the first message.
 15. A system for correlatingconversations, the system comprising an interface device incommunication with a computerized network, the interface devicecomprising: a processor for implementing a software application on theinterface device; a memory for storing the software application and forstoring a plurality of messages in accordance with the softwareapplication; a transmission unit for transmitting messages to thecomputerized network; and a display, wherein the software applicationcomprises instructions for: providing a discussion interface at thedisplay of the user interface device for displaying messages stored inthe memory; providing a message entry location for entering newmessages, the message entry location associated with the discussioninterface; recording an indication that one of several conversations,each comprising one or more of the messages stored in memory, is anactive conversation; modifying a visual element of the message entrylocation based on which of the conversations is the active conversation;receiving at least one new message entered at the message entrylocation; transmitting, using the transmission unit, the at least onenew message to the computerized network incorporating an indication ofwhich of the several conversations was the active conversation at thetime of entry of the new messages; and displaying, at the display, theat least one new message alongside the several conversations andincorporating visual cues shared with any messages that are part of theconversation that was the active conversation upon entry of the at leastone new message.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the display is atouch screen, and wherein the indication recorded that one of theseveral conversations is the active conversation is a tapping input atthe display.
 17. The system of claim 15 wherein the visual element is abackground color.
 18. The system of claim 15, wherein the memory furtherstores user preferences, and wherein the visual cues are defined in theuser preferences.